The conservative right has had many in their ranks who believe and espouse all types of wild conspiracy theories. Now it seems many in the liberal left have joined them. The left is now officially as unhinged and paranoid as the right, to the embarrassment of any intelligent and fair-minded American.
Some
refreshing honesty was published by the completely liberal, left wing
periodical The New Republic. Here are
just a few of the theories / beliefs / facts put out by many liberal
influencers:
---- Russian
Agents assassinated Andrew Breibart so Steve Bannon could take over his web
site.
---- To
prevent a scandalous tape from being released, Donald Trump had Russian agent
Sergei Mikhailov assassinated.
---- The New York Times allowed their op-ed
page to spew out that Mark Zuckerberg, Sean Hannity, Black Lives Matter and
Bernie Sanders are actually undercover Russian operatives.
---- When
Trump switched a meeting from the National Press Club to the Mayflower Hotel at
the last minute, it was because the hotel had a restricted area, and he could
meet there in secret with the Russian ambassador, making a deal of Russian oil
in exchange for influence in American politics.
---- The
Russians had been grooming Trump for ten years, having control over him because
they had evidence that could have had him jailed for sex crimes.
---- Trump
is secretly laying the groundwork for an American authoritarian dictatorship.
---- The
rare time Trump sounds presidential in a speech is actually a ploy for some
secretive sinister objective.
---- Russian
intelligence orchestrated the Anthony Weiner sex scandal, entrapping him by
creating a fake teenage girl profile, placed Clinton emails in his computer,
and sent the information to the FBI.
---- Trumps
numerous blunders are actually a test to find out how much he can get away with
in order to reduce citizen’s basic rights and freedoms.
---- Trump’s
endless unhinged Twitter rants are described as “Russian active measures”.
Inside the mind of conspiracy
theorists – What is behind
all this? The New Republic exposé states:
“Liberals are human beings, and human beings get rattled when they’re afraid.
If the left is succumbing to conspiracy theories, it’s because conspiracy
theories are a way to manage anxiety.”
With the
surprising election of Donald Trump, liberals
have woken up to a nightmare:
“In a
landscape this dystopian, conspiracy offers a salve. It promises an order
behind the madness, some sort of rational explanation for the seeming chaos. It
validates your paranoia, which paradoxically confirms you’re not paranoid. And
most dangerous of all, it affirms your sense that things are hopeless, while
absolving you from having to do anything about it. Conspiracy theories may
temporarily allay our fear, but they ultimately exacerbate the very conditions
that created that fear in the first place.”
Many from
both the left and the right fall for conspiracy claims because of anxiety and a
loss of control over their environment.
Psychological research has discovered that:
“…..individuals
who lack control in a situation are more likely to see images that do not
exist, develop superstitions, and perceive conspiracies …… The term for this
phenomenon is ‘illusory pattern perception,’ and it goes a long way toward
explaining the paranoid mind-set. Conspiracists, fundamentally, believe that
malevolent order is preferable to chaos. Those who assert that Trump and Steve
Bannon are sinister masterminds who secretly control the world from behind the
scenes find the prospect more reassuring than the idea that they are rapacious,
half-assed con men who have bumbled their way into more power than they can
handle.”
These
paranoid beliefs are widely shared through social media for obvious reasons:
“It should
come as no surprise that Twitter is the medium of choice for left-wing
conspiracy theories. As Trump himself has demonstrated, Twitter cares about
only one thing: whether content is sensational enough to go viral. Twitter
enables conspiracy thinkers to unfold their crazy scenarios in incremental,
isolated blasts, each ‘fact’ as disconnected from the others as it is from
reality. What matters isn’t the background or experience of the theorists, or whether any of their claims are
substantiated. Much like adorable cat GIFs or Ellen DeGeneres selfies,
conspiracy tweets play not to our desire to understand the world, but to our
deep-seated need to share the things we find most comforting.”
The subtlety
and deviousness of conspiracy theories is that you can’t argue against them. Theorists
gleefully manipulate people when they “take the standard of evidence that
skeptics value so highly and turn it on its head: Extraordinary claims no longer require extraordinary evidence;
rather an extraordinary lack of evidence is thought to validate the
extraordinariness of the conspiracy.”
Believers in
these theories prefer to take the easy way out than take the time and effort to
make sense of people and events:
“In other
words, it is not the methodology of conspiracy that’s the problem. When
paranoid thinking opens up possibilities, it can serve a useful function. The
danger comes when conspiracists remain wedded to their theories in the face of
conflicting information, when they refuse to do the hard work of confirming and
substantiating their own assumptions and beliefs. Woodward and Bernstein did
not simply point to a trail of shady campaign contributions and tweet that
Nixon was behind it all. They followed
the facts, step by painstaking step, all the way to the Oval Office.”
It is very
difficult to change the mind of someone devoted to their conspiracies. That
action itself would be seen as part of the conspiracy to suppress the so called
“truth”. People who cleverly put out these theories know human nature is their
ally:
“Conspiracy
theories spread like measles: First they infect the weak and vulnerable; then
they spread like wildfire among the entire population. Researchers have found
that if a person believes in one conspiracy, he or she is more likely to
believe in others—even those unrelated to the initial theory. Which is to say,
once conspiracy becomes part of our beliefs, it can be harder to see the world as it truly is. Conspiracy
depends on a rejection of the world as it appears to be. Once this belief takes
root, it becomes harder and harder to differentiate truth from fiction.”
Sources
Colin
Dickey, “The New Paranoia” The New
Republic, June 2017 https://newrepublic.com/article/142977/new-paranoia-trump-election-turns-democrats-conspiracy-theorists
Related Posts
30 Prying
and Probing Questions To Bolster Critical Thinking http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2016/10/30-prying-and-probing-questions-to.html
Sinister Schemes: Unmasking Conspiracy Theorists … ….. http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2016/01/sinister-schemes-unmasking-conspiracy.html
21 Quick &
Undeniable Facts Exposing Conspiracy Theorists
http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2013/12/conspiracy-theories.html
Strange
Gleanings From A Conspiracy Cruise …..……. http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2016/09/strange-gleanings-from-conspiracy-cruise.html
7 Concise
Reasons Why Alex Jones Is A Fraud http://www.mybestbuddymedia.com/2017/05/7-concise-reasons-why-alex-jones-is.html
Photo: https://suzie81.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/image47.jpg
Jerry De Luca is a Christian freelance writer who loves perusing dozens of interesting and informative publications. When he finds any useful info he summarizes it, taking the main points, and creates a (hopefully) helpful blog post.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave any comments...